“An eye for
an eye makes the whole world blind.” This brilliant citation by the
revolutionary non-violent freedom fighter Mahatma Gandhi, talks about the whole
state of affairs of the current world in just 10 words. Following the path of
non-violence can sure save the world from killing itself, but can non-violence
be justified for the most heinous crimes? Do the victims not deserve their right
of getting back? Isn’t it right for a victim to take the law in his/her hands
if the law is helpless and wants evidence when the criminal is visible in plain
daylight?
Revenge has
been an old-fashioned emotion of humans, only the methods have changed- during
the World War people committing crimes were beheaded with guillotines and now
the recent methods of jailing till death have replaced them. And have we heard
about people getting executed due to their crimes in the recent past? The
answer to this is an unambiguous no. People committing atrocious crimes like
raping women or kidnapping and causing bloodbaths have been known to be killed
in the most painless ways or being held captive with provision of the best
services due to the newest human rights laws. But do these savage animals
warrant “human” rights?
Vengeance
has a lot of significance, and not only the local front but also on the global
frontier. Many countries feel it necessary to show off their strengths and
display that their nation is not a weak one and would not get easily bullied
into submission. The reaction of a certain nation to an act of terrorism on a
state can also be counted as a show of force in the field of weaponry and
defense. The action of Japan on the twin bombings during the World War put
their nation away from the torment and inaction. The attack planned and
executed on Pearl Harbour in Hawaii took America by surprise and also acted as
an act of defiance and non-tolerance by Japan towards the larger nation.
An act of
violence which is committed in order to bring the perpetrator of a crime to his
end is an act of justice. Be it violent or non-violent, this act should not be
punished as it makes the person responsible for his crimes feel the pain and
anguish behind his doings. Terrorist attacks in the past decade have not gone
scot-free as the larger sovereign nations of the United States and the other
NATO nations have firmly put their hand on the criminals and have promised the
public to punish them. The killing of Osama bin Laden was a brutal murder by
the United States, but the pride felt by the assassin is extreme as the slaying
of such a criminal soul is considered justice for all of the hundreds
slaughtered in the name of religion.
The rise of
unethical religious terrorist groups like the al-Qaeda or the Ku Klux Klan has
put the world at a higher danger, but aren’t these mischief-mongers supposed to
be wiped of the face of the earth. At some point of time, the general public
has to take action against these evil minds. Killing them after they massacre
scores of people is one of the best options to cleanse the earth of this scum.
But are we
on the right track? Isn’t killing supposed to wipe of the whole human race?
Killing,
even in the name of justice is supposed to be a crime. It may give the victim
the sense of being given justice for a short period of time. But, in the long
term, this feeling scrapes of the soul of the victim. This shows that revenge
is a temporary heaven, but a permanent hell. In the act of taking revenge, the
collateral damage caused to society may rise to unnatural levels and in the end
cause problems to human society. The assassins and Special Forces created by
governments to protect their countries and also to defend them create a whole
race of psychopaths no different from the sinners they wipe off. But isn’t the obstruction
of justice a crime in the statutes of the law? So should we stop justice to the
victims by cutting the criminals from their miseries?
Payback is a
thing supported by all sides of humanity, and it is the universal belief that a
person always gets punished for his sins. Then why shouldn’t man act of his own
accord and punish the perpetrators at that point of time rather than waiting
for a lifetime to pass by? Revenge against a wrong-doer is always justified in
my opinion and it should be taken as soon as the unlawful person is unearthed.